Tibetan verbal morphology differs considerably from that of other Sino‐Tibetan languages. Most of the vocalic and consonantal alternations observed in the verbal paradigms remain unexplained after more than a hundred years of investigation: the study of historical Tibetan morphology would seem to have reached an aporia. This paper proposes a new model, explaining the origin of the alternations in the Tibetan verb as the remnant of a former system of directional prefixes, typologically similar to the ones still attested in the Rgyalrongic languages.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guillaume Jacques (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: