Key result
Combined interval and resistance training is linked to improved LVEF and ~1.1% lower HbA1c in T1D adolescents.
Why the study?
Exercise has been suggested to improve cardiac performance in children with T1D by enhancing glycemic control, but the effects of combined training and subsequent detraining required investigation.
Does a 12-week combined interval running and resistance training program improve cardiac structure and performance in adolescent males with type 1 diabetes?
Does a 12-week combined interval running and resistance training program improve cardiac structure and performance in adolescent males with type 1 diabetes?
A 12-week combined interval running and resistance training program improves glycemic control and echocardiographic indices of cardiac performance in adolescent males with type 1 diabetes, though some changes are reversible after detraining.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Exercise training may aid cardiac function in T1D adolescents; leaves open need for larger RCTs to confirm durability and generalizability.
Background: Exercise has been suggested to effectively improve cardiac performance in children with type 1 diabetes (T1D) by enhancing the glycemic control. The purpose of this study was to investigate (1) effects of a 12-week combined interval running and resistance training (CIRRT) and (2) 1 month of detraining on cardiac structure and myocardial performance in adolescent males with T1D. Methods: A total of 72 participants, including 48 adolescent males with T1D (fasting blood glucose (FBG): 274.67 ± 52.99 mg/dL, age: 15.20 ± 1.78 years) and 24 healthy adolescents (FBG: 90.75 ± 5.47 mg/dL, age: 15.08 ± 1.67 years), were recruited to the study. Participants were allocated into diabetes exercise (DE), diabetes control (DC), and healthy controls (HC) groups. The DE group performed 12 weeks of a CIRRT program three times per week. Blood glucose profile, echocardiography (ECHO) indices, and peak oxygen consumption (VO 2peak ) were measured pre- and post-intervention and following 1-month detraining period. Repeated measures ANOVA was used for pre- and post-intervention comparisons within the DE group and across the three study groups. Significance level was set at p < 0.05. Results: Exercise intervention resulted in decreased hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c% = Pre: 10.44 ± 2.03, Post: 9.38 ± 1.66, p < 0.05), FBG, left ventricular (LV) internal diameter, and both tricuspid and mitral deceleration time (DT) in the DE group. VO 2peak , ejection fraction (EF% = Pre: 62.38 ± 1.6, Post: 64.08 ± 1.18, p < 0.05), fractional shortening, early tricuspid diastolic inflow E velocity, and tricuspid velocity during atrial contraction were also increased following the exercise training. HbA1c (Pre vs Follow-up: 9.83 ± 1.73, p < 0.05), EF (Pre vs Follow-up: 62.97 ± 1.56, p < 0.05), LV, and DT tricuspid remained significantly improved after detraining period compared to the baseline. In the baseline, the glycemic index and ECHO variable significantly differed in the DE and DC groups with the HC group ( p < 0.05). However, after the intervention, the DC and HC groups did not change significantly ( p > 0.05). Conclusion: The CIRRT intervention was associated with improved cardiac structure and performance in male adolescents with T1D potentially due to exercise-induced adaptations. Meanwhile, the results indicate that most cardiac morphological and functional changes are reversible following periods of inactivity in patients with T1D.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Saki et al. (2025) studied Type 1 diabetes (n=72). Combined interval running and resistance training (CIRRT) vs. Diabetes control and healthy controls was evaluated on Cardiac structure, myocardial performance, and glycemic control (p=<0.05). A 12-week combined interval running and resistance training program improved HbA1c (from 10.44% to 9.38%, p<0.05) and ejection fraction (from 62.38% to 64.08%, p<0.05) in adolescent males with T1D.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: