Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Naturally Fractured Reservoirs (NFR's) have received little attention as potential CO 2 storage sites. Two main facts deter from storage projects in fractured reservoirs: (1) CO 2 tends to be nonwetting in target formations and capillary forces will keep CO 2 in the fractures, which typically have low pore volume; and (2) the high conductivity of the fractures may lead to increased spatial spreading of the CO 2 plume. Numerical simulations are a powerful tool to understand the physics behind brine‐CO 2 flow in NFR's. Dual‐porosity models are typically used to simulate multiphase flow in fractured formations. However, existing dual‐porosity models are based on crude approximations of the matrix‐fracture fluid transfer processes and often fail to capture the dynamics of fluid exchange accurately. Therefore, more accurate transfer functions are needed in order to evaluate the CO 2 transfer to the matrix. This work presents an assessment of CO 2 storage potential in NFR's using dual‐porosity models. We investigate the impact of a system of fractures on storage in a saline aquifer, by analyzing the time scales of brine drainage by CO 2 in the matrix blocks and the maximum CO 2 that can be stored in the rock matrix. A new model to estimate drainage time scales is developed and used in a transfer function for dual‐porosity simulations. We then analyze how injection rates should be limited in order to avoid early spill of CO 2 (lost control of the plume) on a conceptual anticline model. Numerical simulations on the anticline show that naturally fractured reservoirs may be used to store CO 2 .
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
March et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: