Key result
Enrollment in Medicare Part D was not significantly associated with a difference in 30-day all-cause mortality compared to nonenrollment after multivariable adjustment (HR 1.06; 95% CI 0.97-1.17).
Why the study?
Does enrollment in Medicare Part D improve 30-day and 1-year outcomes in Medicare beneficiaries aged ≥65 years discharged after acute myocardial infarction?
Cohort (n=59,149)
Yes
Does enrollment in Medicare Part D improve 30-day and 1-year outcomes in Medicare beneficiaries aged ≥65 years discharged after acute myocardial infarction?
Hazard Ratio: 1.06 (95% CI 0.97–1.17)
Absolute Event Rate: 4% vs 3.3%
Enrollment in Medicare Part D was not associated with substantially improved 30-day or 1-year adjusted outcomes after AMI, highlighting ongoing gaps in medication adherence despite prescription drug coverage.
Medicare Part D enrollment was associated with better post-AMI outcomes; leaves open confounding versus benefit in this observational analysis.
BACKGROUND: Little is known about whether enrollment versus nonenrollment in Medicare's prescription drug plan (Part D) is associated with better outcomes after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). METHODS AND RESULTS: Using Medicare records linked to Acute Coronary Treatment and Intervention Outcomes Network Registry-Get With The Guidelines, we identified 59 149 Medicare beneficiaries (age ≥65 years) discharged after AMI between January 2007 and December 2010. We described trends in Medicare Part D enrollment, and compared the following 30-day and 1-year outcomes: all-cause death, all-cause readmissions, and major adverse cardiac events (a composite of all-cause death or readmission for AMI or stroke) between Part D enrollees and nonenrollees, after adjustment for patient and hospital factors. From 2007 to 2010, 29 264 (49.5%) patients with AMI enrolled in Medicare were also participating in Part D by hospital discharge. All-cause 30-day death was more common among enrollees versus nonenrollees (4.0% versus 3.3%), but this difference was not statistically significant after multivariable adjustment (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.06 [95% confidence interval, 0.97-1.17]). Enrollees also had higher unadjusted risks of 30-day all-cause readmissions or major adverse cardiac events, and 1-year mortality, all-cause readmissions, or major adverse cardiac events, but these were attenuated after multivariable adjustment. Adherence to key secondary prevention medications (statins, β-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blockers, and P2Y12 antagonists) remained low (range, 55%-64%) at 1 year post discharge among Part D enrollees. CONCLUSIONS: Only half of Medicare-insured patients with AMI were enrolled in Part D by hospital discharge, and their 30-day and 1-year adjusted outcomes did not differ substantially from nonenrollees. There remain opportunities for improvement in medication adherence among patients with prescription drug coverage.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Goyal et al. (2015) conducted a cohort in acute myocardial infarction (n=59,149). Medicare Part D enrollment vs. nonenrollment in Medicare Part D was evaluated on all-cause 30-day death (HR 1.06, 95% CI 0.97-1.17). Enrollment in Medicare Part D was not significantly associated with a difference in 30-day all-cause mortality compared to nonenrollment after multivariable adjustment (HR 1.06; 95% CI 0.97-1.17).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: