Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Video-based and in vivo (face-to-face) contact have been shown to be effective ways to change stigmatising attitudes and behaviours. The two approaches reflect the strengths and weakness of sometimes conflicting priorities in anti-stigma programmes: broad audience v. grassroots control. Regardless of perspective, anti-stigma interventions have the greatest impact when contact is targeted, local, credible and continuous.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Patrick W. Corrigan (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: