Key result
Having all three advanced diastolic dysfunction criteria significantly increased the risk of heart failure readmission (HR 4.0) compared to having zero criteria in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction.
Why the study?
Because grade 2-3 diastolic dysfunction requires 2 of 3 criteria and predicts heart failure readmission, investigators tested whether meeting all 3 criteria predicts greater risk than meeting only 2.
Does an increased number of abnormal diastolic dysfunction criteria predict greater risk of heart failure readmission in patients with HFrEF?
Cohort (n=380)
No
Does an increased number of abnormal diastolic dysfunction criteria predict greater risk of heart failure readmission in patients with HFrEF?
Hazard Ratio: 4 (95% CI 2.9–8.36)
Absolute Event Rate: 60% vs 24%
p-value: p=<0.0001
Increasing the number of abnormal diastolic dysfunction criteria improves the prediction of heart failure readmission in patients with HFrEF.
Single DDys criterion associated with higher HF readmission; leaves open whether criteria refine risk stratification in prospective cohorts.
Background: Advanced diastolic dysfunction (DDys) correlates with elevated LV filling pressures and predicts heart failure readmission (HF-R). As grade 2-3 DDys has predictive value for HF-R, and requires 2 of 3 criteria (left atrial volume index >34 ml/m2, E/e’>14, or tricuspid regurgitation velocity >2.8 m/s), we hypothesized that all 3 criteria would predict greater HF risk than any 2 criteria. Methods: In this single-center retrospective study that included 380 patients in sinus rhythm with HF and reduced ejection, we recorded patient characteristics, Doppler-echo, and HF-R with follow-up to 2167 days (median=1423 days; interquartile range=992-1821 days). Results: For grade 1 DDys (223 patients), any single criteria resulted in greater HF-R as compared to 0 criteria (HR=2.52, (1.56-3.88) p<0.0001) with an AUC (area under curve)=0.637, p<0.001. For grade 2 DDys (94 patients), there was greater HF-R for all 3 ( vs . 0 criteria: HR=4.0 (2.90-8.36), p<0.0001). There was greater HF-R for 3 vs any 2 criteria (HR=1.81, (1.10-3.39), p=0.0222). For all 3 criteria, there was moderate predictability for HF-R (AUC=0.706, p<0.0001) which was more predictive than any 2 criteria (AUC difference 0.057, (0.011-0.10), p=0.009). For grade 3 DDys (63 patients), E/A>2+2-3 criteria identified a subgroup with the greatest risk of HF-R (HR=5.03 (4.62-22.72), p<0.0001) compared with 0 DDys criteria with moderate predictability for 2-3 criteria (AUC=0.726, p<0.0001) exceeding E/A>2+0-1 criteria (AUC difference=0.120, (0.061-0.182), p<0.001). Conclusion: Increasing the number of abnormal criteria increased the risk and predictive value of HF-R for grade 1-3 DDys in patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lavine et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (n=380). Advanced diastolic dysfunction criteria (LAVI >34 ml/m2, E/e'>14, TR velocity >2.8 m/s) vs. 0 criteria (reduced ejection fraction alone) was evaluated on Heart failure readmission (HR 4.0, 95% CI 2.90-8.36, p=<0.0001). Having all three advanced diastolic dysfunction criteria significantly increased the risk of heart failure readmission (HR 4.0) compared to having zero criteria in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: