Agriculturally impacted ecosystems can be a source of the greenhouse gas, nitrous oxide (N(2)O); yet in situ measurements of N(2)O fluxes are sparse, particularly in streams and rivers. Dissolved N(2)O was measured from 9 sites over a 13-month period and a gas exchange model was used to predict N(2)O fluxes. N(2)O fluxes were measured at 4 sites on 7 sampling dates using floating chambers. In addition, dissolved N(2)O in porewaters was measured at 4 sites at various depths from 2 to 30 cm. Dissolved N(2)O-N concentrations in surface waters (0.31-1.60 μg L(-1)) varied seasonally with highest concentrations in late fall and early summer and lowest in winter. Estimated N(2)O-N fluxes (26.2-207 μg m(-2) hr(-1)) were in relative agreement with measured N(2)O fluxes using floating chambers (9.5-372 μg m(-2) hr(-1)) and correlated strongly with temperature and nitrate concentrations (R(2) = 0.86). Maximum dissolved N(2)O-N:NO(3)(-)-N ratios were higher in sediment-porewaters at 0.16, compared to surface waters (0.010). The calculated EF5-r value (mean = 0.0028; range = 0.0012-0.0069) was up to 3 times greater than the current IPCC EF5-r emissions factor (0.0025 kg N(2)O-N emitted per kg of NO(3)(-)-N leached). The highest EF5-r values were found in the high-flow sampling events when dissolved N(2)O and NO(3)(-) concentrations were low, highlighting potential constraints in the IPCC methodology for large rivers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hinshaw et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: