PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
November 1, 1999Pain375 citations

Complex regional pain syndrome: are the IASP diagnostic criteria valid and sufficiently comprehensive?

View Full Paper
NHNorman R. HardenSBStephen BruehlBGBradley S. Galer

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

This is a multisite study examining the internal validity and comprehensiveness of the International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) diagnostic criteria for Complex Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS). A standardized sign/symptom checklist was used in patient evaluations to obtain data on CRPS-related signs and symptoms in a series of 123 patients meeting IASP criteria for CRPS. Principal components factor analysis (PCA) was used to detect statistical groupings of signs/symptoms (factors). CRPS signs and symptoms grouped together statistically in a manner somewhat different than in current IASP/CRPS criteria. As in current criteria, a separate pain/sensation criterion was supported. However, unlike in current criteria, PCA indicated that vasomotor symptoms form a factor distinct from a sudomotor/edema factor. Changes in range of motion, motor dysfunction, and trophic changes, which are not included in the IASP criteria, formed a distinct fourth factor. Scores on the pain/sensation factor correlated positively with pain duration (P<0. 001), but there was a negative correlation between the sudomotor/edema factor scores and pain duration (P<0.05). The motor/trophic factor predicted positive responses to sympathetic block (P<0.05). These results suggest that the internal validity of the IASP/CRPS criteria could be improved by separating vasomotor signs/symptoms (e.g. temperature and skin color asymmetry) from those reflecting sudomotor dysfunction (e.g. sweating changes) and edema. Results also indicate motor and trophic changes may be an important and distinct component of CRPS which is not currently incorporated in the IASP criteria. An experimental revision of CRPS diagnostic criteria for research purposes is proposed. Implications for diagnostic sensitivity and specificity are discussed.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Harden et al. (1999) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a5e9c229e99e7407a7e0d55https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-3959(99)00104-9
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1A hypothesis on the physiological basis for causalgia and related pains1986 · 573 citations
  2. 2Development of diagnostic criteria for headache syndromes: Lessons from psychiatry1993 · 40 citations
  3. 3Use of Cluster Analysis to Validate IHS Diagnostic Criteria for Migraine and Tension‐Type Headache1999 · 42 citations
  4. 4Pain and the sympathetic nervous system1990 · 131 citations
  5. 5RSD Score1992 · 103 citations