Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Permeability is a key parameter for coalbed methane development. Although the absolute permeability of coal has been extensively studied, wettability and pore structure properties continue to challenge the microscopic description of water-gas flow in coal. For this purpose, we reconstructed the microstructures of low-rank coal using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) images. Pore geometry and pore-throat parameters are introduced to establish a relationship with absolute permeability. A dual-porosity pore network model is developed to study water-gas displacement under different wetting and pore structure properties. Results show that absolute permeability is significantly affected by pore geometry and can be described using a binary quadratic function of porosity and fractal dimension. Water-gas relative permeability varies significantly and the residual gas saturation is lower; the crossover saturation first decreased and then increased with increasing porosity under hydrophobic conditions. While the water relative permeability is lower and a certain amount of gas is trapped in complex pore-throat networks; the crossover saturation is higher under hydrophilic conditions. Models with large percolating porosity and well-developed pore networks have high displacement efficiency due to low capillary resistance and avoidance of trapping. This work provides a systematic description of absolute permeability and water-gas relative permeability in coal microstructure for enhanced gas recovery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Qin et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: