Key result
In patients with newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation, VKA prescription rates were similar between those with a SAMe-TT2R2 score >2 (28.0%) and those with a score ≤2 (27.5%).
Why the study?
It was hypothesized that in clinical practice, VKAs may be prescribed less frequently to patients with AF and SAMe-TT2R2 scores >2 than to patients with lower scores.
Does the SAMe-TT2R2 score influence the selection of anticoagulant (VKA vs NOAC) in clinical practice for patients with newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation?
Observational (n=17,465)
Yes
Does the SAMe-TT2R2 score influence the selection of anticoagulant (VKA vs NOAC) in clinical practice for patients with newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation?
In clinical practice, the SAMe-TT2R2 score does not appear to influence the choice between VKAs and NOACs for patients with newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation.
The SAMe-TT2R2 score helps identify patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) likely to have poor anticoagulation control during anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists (VKA) and those with scores >2 might be better managed with a target-specific oral anticoagulant (NOAC). We hypothesized that in clinical practice, VKAs may be prescribed less frequently to patients with AF and SAMe-TT2R2 scores >2 than to patients with lower scores. We analyzed the Phase III dataset of the Global Registry on Long-Term Oral Antithrombotic Treatment in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation (GLORIA-AF), a large, global, prospective global registry of patients with newly diagnosed AF and ≥1 stroke risk factor. We compared baseline clinical characteristics and antithrombotic prescriptions to determine the probability of the VKA prescription among anticoagulated patients with the baseline SAMe-TT2R2 score >2 and ≤ 2. Among 17,465 anticoagulated patients with AF, 4,828 (27.6%) patients were prescribed VKA and 12,637 (72.4%) patients an NOAC: 11,884 (68.0%) patients had SAMe-TT2R2 scores 0-2 and 5,581 (32.0%) patients had scores >2. The proportion of patients prescribed VKA was 28.0% among patients with SAMe-TT2R2 scores >2 and 27.5% in those with scores ≤2. The lack of a clear association between the SAMe-TT2R2 score and anticoagulant selection may be attributed to the relative efficacy and safety profiles between NOACs and VKAs as well as to the absence of trial evidence that an SAMe-TT2R2-guided strategy for the selection of the type of anticoagulation in NVAF patients has an impact on clinical outcomes of efficacy and safety. The latter hypothesis is currently being tested in a randomized controlled trial. URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov//Unique identifier: NCT01937377, NCT01468701, and NCT01671007.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ntaios et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Atrial fibrillation (n=17,465). SAMe-TT2R2 score >2 vs. SAMe-TT2R2 score ≤2 was evaluated on Prescription of vitamin K antagonists (VKA). In patients with newly diagnosed atrial fibrillation, VKA prescription rates were similar between those with a SAMe-TT2R2 score >2 (28.0%) and those with a score ≤2 (27.5%).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: