As structural biology trends towards larger and more complex biomolecular targets, a detailed understanding of their interactions and underlying structures and dynamics is required. The development of methyl-TROSY has enabled NMR spectroscopy to provide atomic-resolution insight into the mechanisms of large molecular assemblies in solution. However, the applicability of methyl-TROSY has been hindered by the laborious and time-consuming resonance assignment process, typically performed with domain fragmentation, site-directed mutagenesis, and analysis of NOE data in the context of a crystal structure. In response, several structure-based automatic methyl assignment strategies have been developed over the past decade. Here, we present a comprehensive analysis of all available methods and compare their input data requirements, algorithmic strategies, and reported performance. In general, the methods fall into two categories: those that primarily rely on inter-methyl NOEs, and those that utilize methyl PRE- and PCS-based restraints. We discuss their advantages and limitations, and highlight the potential benefits from standardizing and combining different methods.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pritišanac et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: