We develop a climate-aware total portfolio framework incorporating climate risk across a broad universe of asset classes - stocks, bonds, and alternatives, including corporate bonds, commodities, listed real estate, and hedge funds - alongside a comprehensive set of low-carbon assets. The framework captures dynamic interactions between asset prices and global warming risks through a vector autoregression (VAR) model, embedding forward-looking climate scenarios into portfolio returns via a stylized return-generation model that explicitly accounts for uncertainty in future climate pathways. Our results reveal that low-carbon assets exhibit a resilient - and in some cases positive - relationship with temperature change, while most traditional assets are adversely affected by warming risk. Examining an optimistic trajectory implied by the VAR model and a pessimistic trajectory derived from the DICE model, we find that under the pessimistic scenario, a substantial reallocation toward low-carbon assets emerges - suggesting that for long-horizon investors, sustainable investing is not merely an ethical choice, but an optimal portfolio strategy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: