Key result
The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) cohort of over 6,000 adults has provided extensive data on subclinical cardiovascular disease progression, yielding over 1,000 publications.
Cohort (n=6,000)
The MESA cohort is a landmark diverse population-based study that has extensively characterized subclinical cardiovascular disease and its progression, yielding over 1,000 publications.
MESA cohort enables longitudinal study of subclinical CVD progression across diverse groups; leaves open clinical translation pending further outcome data.
The MESA (Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis) was initiated to address unresolved questions about subclinical cardiovascular disease and its progression to clinically overt cardiovascular disease in a diverse population-based sample, incorporating emerging imaging technologies for better evaluation of subclinical disease and creating a population laboratory for future research. MESA's recruited (from 2000 to 2002) cohort comprised >6,000 adults from 4 racial/ethnic groups, ages 45 to 84 years, who were free of cardiovascular disease at baseline. Extensive cohort data have been collected over 5 exams (through 2011) with additional exam components added through extramurally funded ancillary study grants, and through regular phone follow-up contacts. Over 1,000 MESA papers have been published to date. Exam 6 will incorporate components that use novel wearable, imaging, and other technologies to address new research questions. MESA investigators have and continue to seek opportunities for collaboration with other researchers on a wide variety of topics to further expand the science of MESA.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Olson et al. (2016) conducted a cohort in Subclinical cardiovascular disease (n=6,000). Subclinical cardiovascular disease was evaluated. The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) cohort of over 6,000 adults has provided extensive data on subclinical cardiovascular disease progression, yielding over 1,000 publications.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: