Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
At-home spirometry could provide added value for the diagnosis and monitoring of obstructive pulmonary disease in primary care. However, it is unknown whether implementation in a real-world setting is practicable and produces good quality spirometry. We studied feasibility, quality and added value of at-home spirometry in primary care practices in the Netherlands and Sweden. Adults with an asthma- or COPD-related spirometry indication were provided with equipment to perform unsupervised spirometry at-home. Differences in FEV 1 and FVC-values from home and general practice were compared, and questionnaires on feasibility were completed by participants and healthcare professionals (HCPs). Of 140 participants, 89.3% completed a home spirometry session, of whom 59.2% produced acceptable spirometry. Overall, HCPs and participants rated home spirometry as feasible and of added value for asthma and COPD monitoring in primary care, though less helpful for diagnostic purposes. A small mean difference in spirometry results was observed, with FEV 1 and FVC at-home being 0.076 and 0.094 L higher than at the GP office, respectively.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rütte et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: