Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Shows how innovation and openness promote economic low-carbon transformation in China, indicating valuable insights for global climate goals.
Balancing economic growth and ecological protection is key to achieving the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), yet single policies often fail in low-carbon transitions. This study utilizes panel data from 251 Chinese cities (2006–2022) and employs a double machine learning (DML) approach to assess whether the policy mix of innovation and openness exerts a synergistic effect on the economic low-carbon transition. The results indicate that innovation and openness significantly promote economic low-carbon transformation; the combined effect of innovation and openness exceeds the sum of their individual effects by 7.91%. Notably, the effect of openness policy shifts from insignificant when implemented alone to significant when combined with innovation policy, with the combined policy effect reaching 101.08% of the effect of innovation policy alone. These findings remain robust after a series of sensitivity tests and addressing endogeneity concerns. Mechanism analysis reveals that innovation and openness synergistically drive economic low-carbon transformation by expanding foreign investment creation, fostering green innovation agglomeration, and promoting industrial upgrading. Cross-sectional analysis shows that the synergistic effect is more pronounced in eastern and non-resource-based cities in China. In summary, innovation and openness constitute a synergistic policy mix that effectively promotes economic low-carbon transformation, offering valuable insights for other economies seeking to advance their own low-carbon transitions. Specifically, this synergistic effect not only drives the decoupling of economic growth from carbon emissions but also directly contributes to carbon emission reduction, laying a solid foundation for achieving global climate goals.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zeng et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: