Examines verbal fluency tests' ability to distinguish credible from non-credible groups, indicating their efficiency.
= 73). Classification accuracy was examined for COWAT and Animal Naming raw scores, demographically adjusted T-scores, and two previously published logistic regression models. Both verbal fluency measures significantly differentiated credible from non-credible groups. Optimal indices utilized COWAT raw scores, either alone or when embedded within the logistic regression formula. Findings support verbal fluency measures as efficient embedded, non-memory-based PVTs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Johnson et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: