Key result
Active bilateral parietal tRNS reduces reaction times versus sham and modulates frontal ERP markers.
Why the study?
Transcranial random noise stimulation has shown potential for cognitive enhancement, but its electrophysiological mechanisms remain unclear.
Does active high-frequency tRNS over bilateral posterior parietal regions improve PASAT performance and modulate ERP indices of cognitive control in healthy adults?
RCT (n=40)
double-blind
randomized
Does active high-frequency tRNS over bilateral posterior parietal regions improve PASAT performance and modulate ERP indices of cognitive control in healthy adults?
A single session of bilateral parietal tRNS reduces response latency and modulates frontal ERP markers during a demanding cognitive task.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Bilateral parietal tRNS may speed PASAT processing; leaves open utility for cognitive control deficits in neurological populations.
OBJECTIVE: Cognitive control is essential for goal-directed behavior and is often impaired in neurological conditions. Transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) has shown potential for cognitive enhancement, but its electrophysiological mechanisms remain unclear. This study examined whether bilateral parietal tRNS modulates paced auditory serial addition test (PASAT) performance (reaction time and accuracy) and event-related potential (ERP) indices of cognitive control. METHODS: In a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled crossover study, 40 healthy adults received active high-frequency tRNS (100-640 Hz, 2 mA, 20 min) or sham stimulation over bilateral posterior parietal regions. PASAT performance (reaction time, accuracy) and EEG were recorded pre- and post-stimulation. ERP analyses focused on N200, P300, and late slow wave (LSW). RESULTS: Active tRNS significantly reduced reaction times compared to sham, with no stimulation-specific effect on accuracy. Neurophysiologically, active tRNS reduced frontal N200 negativity and increased frontal P300 amplitude. Additionally, reductions in reaction time were significantly associated with increases in frontal P300 amplitude. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that a single session of bilateral parietal tRNS reduced response latency and was associated with changes in frontal ERP markers during a demanding cognitive task. These results provide preliminary electrophysiological evidence that parietal tRNS may influence task-related neural activity expressed at frontal sites, with ERPs serving as potential markers of stimulation-related changes in performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cui et al. (2026) conducted an RCT in healthy adults (n=40). Bilateral parietal transcranial random noise stimulation (tRNS) vs. sham stimulation was evaluated on PASAT performance (reaction time and accuracy) and event-related potential (ERP) indices. Active bilateral parietal tRNS significantly reduced reaction times compared to sham stimulation and modulated frontal ERP markers during a demanding cognitive task.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: