Key result
KardiaMobile 6L and Apple Watch do not induce electromagnetic interference in pediatric patients with CIEDs.
Why the study?
The safety, potential electromagnetic interference, and clinical benefits of portable heart monitors in children and adolescents with CIEDs remain to be established.
Do smartphone-based heart monitors (KardiaMobile 6L and Apple Watch) induce electromagnetic interference or adverse events in pediatric patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices?
Cross-Sectional (n=32)
No
Do smartphone-based heart monitors (KardiaMobile 6L and Apple Watch) induce electromagnetic interference or adverse events in pediatric patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices?
Smartphone-based heart monitors like KardiaMobile 6L and Apple Watch are safe and do not cause electromagnetic interference in pediatric patients with CIEDs, while accurately measuring heart rate and detecting non-capture events.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports safe use of smartphone monitors in pediatric CIED patients; leaves open need for prospective trials to confirm utility.
BACKGROUND: Portable heart monitors enable on-demand electrocardiogram (ECG) recordings and enhance symptom-rhythm correlation. However, concerns have been raised regarding potential electromagnetic interference (EMI) from these monitors that may affect cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). The safety and clinical benefits of portable heart monitors in children and adolescents with implanted CIEDs remain to be established. OBJECTIVES: The primary objective was to determine whether KardiaMobile 6L and Apple Watch induce EMI, impacting the function of CIEDs in pediatric patients. Secondary aims included the assessment of the accuracy of heart rate measurement and their ability to detect non-capture events. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, patients aged 5 years or older with implanted CIEDs were recruited from a tertiary pediatric cardiac center. Each subject had four 30 s ECGs acquired using KardiaMobile 6L and Apple Watch. Subjects were monitored for cardiac symptoms during ECG acquisition, and CIEDs were assessed for EMI. The collected ECGs were analyzed for interpretability, accuracy of heart rate measurement, and detection of non-capture events. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients (median age 14.0 years, IQR 9.9-16.6) were recruited. No adverse clinical events were identified. No EMI was detected during ECG acquisition, regardless of patient and CIED characteristics. Ninety-eight percent of acquired ECGs were interpretable. Both devices demonstrated excellent accuracy of heart rate measurement (ρ = 0.99) and a sensitivity of 100% for identifying ventricular non-capture events. CONCLUSIONS: KardiaMobile 6L and Apple Watch did not induce EMI in children and adolescents with CIEDs, enabling reliable heart rate measurement and accurate identification of ventricular non-captures on these smartphone-based portable heart monitors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ho et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) (n=32). KardiaMobile 6L and Apple Watch was evaluated on Electromagnetic interference (EMI) impacting the function of CIEDs. KardiaMobile 6L and Apple Watch did not induce electromagnetic interference in children and adolescents with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (0% EMI detected).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: