Key result
The presence of diagnostic Q waves in inferior leads accompanied by repolarization abnormalities increased the positive predictive value for diagnosing inferior wall myocardial infarction to 92.00% compared to 53.57% for computerized interpretation alone.
Why the study?
Does manual interpretation of Q waves and repolarization abnormalities improve the positive predictive value for diagnosing old inferior wall myocardial infarction compared to computerized ECG interpretation?
Cross-Sectional (n=56)
Does manual interpretation of Q waves and repolarization abnormalities improve the positive predictive value for diagnosing old inferior wall myocardial infarction compared to computerized ECG interpretation?
Absolute Event Rate: 92% vs 53.57%
Manual interpretation of ECGs for diagnostic Q waves and repolarization abnormalities significantly improves the positive predictive value for diagnosing old inferior myocardial infarction compared to computerized interpretation alone, potentially reducing unnecessary imaging.
Clinicians should not rely on computerized ECG alone for old inferior MI; challenges automated diagnosis and supports manual confirmation in practice and trials.
Background: A diagnosis of an old Inferior Wall Myocardial Infarction (IMI), on a routinely performed Electrocardiogram (ECG) often leads to further consultations and imaging studies. The aim of this study was to assess the predictive value of Q waves in inferior leads, alone or in combination with repolarization abnormalities, for the diagnosis of inferior wall myocardial infarction confirmed by imaging studies. Methods: Fifty-six patients, in whom computerized interpretation of the electrocardiogram resulted in the diagnosis of inferior wall myocardial infarction, and in whom imaging studies were also available, were included in this study. Electrocardiograms were performed using the GE MACHD 5500. Electrocardiograms were interpreted using the MUSE GE system. Echocardiograms and nuclear medicine cardiac imaging were performed and interpreted using standard equipment and techniques. S AS 9.3 software (SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, North Carolina) was used to calculate 95% exact binomial confidence intervals (CI) for the population PPVs. Results: Computerized interpretation of the ECGs leading to the diagnosis of old inferior wall myocardial infarction when compared with inferior wall myocardial infarction confirmed by imaging studies, had a positive predictive value of 52.78%. Adding the criteria of Q waves wider than 0.04 ms, using manual interpretation of ECG, increased the positive predictive value of the test to 80%. However, the presence of ST changes and/or negative or isoelectric T waves, in the presence of diagnostic Q waves in the inferior leads, increased the positive predictive value to 92%. Conclusion: These results suggest that the computerized interpretation of ECG results in a high rate of false positive readings of old inferior myocardial infarction. This may result in overutilization of imaging modalities. Presence of diagnostic Q waves in inferior leads, if accompanied by repolarization abnormalities, improves the accuracy of the electrocardiogram for the diagnosis of inferior wall myocardial infarction..
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abedin et al. (2018) conducted a cross-sectional in Old inferior wall myocardial infarction (n=56). Diagnostic Q waves in inferior leads accompanied by repolarization abnormalities vs. Computerized ECG interpretation was evaluated on Positive predictive value (PPV) for the diagnosis of inferior wall myocardial infarction confirmed by imaging (95% CI 73.97-99.02%). The presence of diagnostic Q waves in inferior leads accompanied by repolarization abnormalities increased the positive predictive value for diagnosing inferior wall myocardial infarction to 92.00% compared to 53.57% for computerized interpretation alone.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: