Key result
CO-OP protocol improves functional performance on self-selected goals in chronic stroke.
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE: Early evidence suggests the use of cognitive strategies has potential to improve skill performance in people living with the effects of stroke, but no specific protocol has been identified. This study aimed to explore the potential of using the Cognitive Orientation to daily Occupational Performance (CO-OP) protocol to improve the functional performance of adults with chronic stroke. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A single case experimental design study with two replications was conducted. Three community-dwelling participants were recruited. Each selected three functional goals for the focus of the CO-OP intervention. Multiple video recorded data points were collected at baseline, during intervention, post-intervention and at 1-month follow-up. RESULTS: The nine goals selected varied widely, e.g. using a computer mouse, bicycling and yoga. An independent observer used the observational Performance Quality Rating Scale (PQRS) to rate performances throughout. Using the 2 SD band method to analyse the data, each participant showed significant performance improvements in at least two goals during the course of the intervention and at follow-up. Two participants had an additional goal show significant improvement at follow-up. CONCLUSION: Results provide preliminary evidence that CO-OP is associated with significant performance improvements in self-selected functional goals.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
McEwen et al. (2009) studied chronic stroke (n=3). Cognitive Orientation to daily Occupational Performance (CO-OP) protocol vs. Baseline (self-controlled) was evaluated on Functional performance on self-selected goals assessed by the Performance Quality Rating Scale (PQRS). The Cognitive Orientation to daily Occupational Performance (CO-OP) protocol significantly improved functional performance in at least two self-selected goals for all 3 participants with chronic stroke.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: