Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
AIM: The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term effects of Class 2 functional treatment on airway dimensions and positional changes in hyoid bone and compare it with that of an untreated Class 2 control group. METHODS: Lateral cephalograms of 16 patients (eight girls, eight boys, mean chronological age = 11.36 ± 0.77 years) who were treated with activator and 19 patients (11 girls, eight boys, mean chronological age = 12.14 ± 0.65 years) who served as control were used for linear, angular and area measurements regarding airway track and hyoid bone. Statistics. Intra-group comparisons were performed by paired t-test and Wilcoxon test, whereas independent t-test and Mann Whitney-U were used for inter-group comparisons. RESULTS: During treatment (T2-T1), nasopharyngeal height and nasopharyngeal area increased (p < 0.05) and hyoid bone moved downward (H-SN; p < 0.001) and forward (H-C3; p < 0.01). During retention period (T3-T2); nasopharyngeal (p < 0.01) and oropharyngeal area increased (p < 0.05). H-SN (p < 0.01) and C3-H distances (p < 0.05) increased. Hyoid bone position exhibited significant changes (H-SN, p < 0.001; C3-H, p < 0.01). The increases in C3-H in long-term was more in the activator group than control (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In growing Class 2 patients with mandibular deficiency and airway track without obstructions, functional appliance treatment provided favorable effects on nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal area throughout the retention period.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ulusoy et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: