Compares temperature fields in two- and three-dimensional arc plasma configurations, suggesting minor differences in results.
A three-dimensional (3D) argon arc plasma at atmospheric pressure is presented. The model is developed using the commercial code Fluent. Two arc plasma configurations are studied: a free burning arc and a transferred arc. In the free burning arc configuration, the 3D results are compared with a two-dimensional (2D) configuration. The natural axis of symmetry of the system, given by the physical operating conditions and by the cathode tip geometry, leads to a good agreement between the 2D and 3D results. The model is validated by comparisons with experimental and theoretical temperature fields. The results show a small difference between the 2D and 3D models, as does the other literature. In the transferred arc configuration model the injection is given by three injectors. A rigorous modelling of the injection cannot be treated using a symmetric plane or a symmetric axis, so the results are presented in a real 3D configuration and compared with results obtained in a 2D configuration. Indeed, in a 2D configuration, due to the symmetrical condition on the axis, the main assumption consists of representation of the real injection geometry by an equivalent surface injection. The imposed mass flow rate is then distributed along a ring and differences can appear in the results.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Freton et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: