Key result
Neprilysin inhibitors increase bradykinin levels, contributing to therapeutic benefits in cardiovascular disease but also increasing the risk of angioedema, especially when combined with ACE inhibitors.
Why the study?
Does neprilysin inhibitor therapy increase the risk of angioedema compared to ACE inhibitors in patients with hypertension or heart failure?
Does neprilysin inhibitor therapy increase the risk of angioedema compared to ACE inhibitors in patients with hypertension or heart failure?
While neprilysin inhibitors increase bradykinin levels and the risk of angioedema, the dual angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor LCZ696 demonstrates an acceptably low risk of angioedema in patients with HFrEF.
Neprilysin inhibition raises bradykinin; leaves open strategies to retain cardiovascular benefits while curbing angioedema risk.
Bradykinin has important physiological actions related to the regulation of blood vessel tone and renal function, and protection from ischemia reperfusion injury. However, bradykinin also contributes to pathological states such as angioedema and inflammation. Bradykinin is metabolized by many different peptidases that play a major role in the control of bradykinin levels. Peptidase inhibitor therapies such as angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) and neprilysin inhibitors increase bradykinin levels, and the challenge for such therapies is to achieve the beneficial cardiovascular and renal effects without the adverse consequences such as angioedema that may result from increased bradykinin levels. Neprilysin also metabolizes natriuretic peptides. However, despite the potential therapeutic benefit of increased natriuretic peptide and bradykinin levels, neprilysin inhibitor therapy has only modest efficacy in essential hypertension and heart failure. Initial attempts to combine neprilysin inhibition with inhibition of the renin angiotensin system led to the development of omapatrilat, a drug that combines ACE and neprilysin inhibition. However, omapatrilat produced an unacceptably high incidence of angioedema in patients with hypertension (2.17%) in comparison with the ACE inhibitor enalapril (0.68%), although angioedema incidence was less in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) treated with omapatrilat (0.8%), and not different from that for enalapril therapy (0.5%). More recently, LCZ696, a drug that combines angiotensin receptor blockade and neprilysin inhibition, was approved for the treatment of HFrEF. The approval of LCZ696 therapy for HFrEF represents the first approval of long-term neprilysin inhibitor administration. While angioedema incidence was acceptably low in HFrEF patients receiving LCZ696 therapy (0.45%), it remains to be seen whether LCZ696 therapy for other conditions such as hypertension is also accompanied by an acceptable incidence of angioedema.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Duncan J. Campbell (2018) conducted a review in Hypertension and Heart Failure. Neprilysin inhibitors (e.g., omapatrilat, LCZ696) vs. ACE inhibitors (e.g., enalapril) was evaluated. Neprilysin inhibitors increase bradykinin levels, contributing to therapeutic benefits in cardiovascular disease but also increasing the risk of angioedema, especially when combined with ACE inhibitors.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: