Current thinking on the subject of dietary fibre tends to emphasize an inclusive definition that overlooks disparate characteristics of individual fibres and their components. The current definition includes all carbohydrate and some noncarbohydrate components that are resistant to mammalian enzymes. The analytical approach proposes to resolve the differences between sources of fibre by characterizing the different proportions of cellulose, hemicellulose, pectin, etc. and in turn resolving these into their respective component sugars.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
P.J. Van Soest (1984) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: