Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether blood-based biomarkers in the first days of life could specifically predict cerebral palsy (CP) and/or cognitive/language delay in infants with moderate-severe HIE. STUDY DESIGN: A secondary analysis of the High Dose Erythropoietin for Asphyxia and Encephalopathy (HEAL) Trial, which examined erythropoietin as an adjunct to therapeutic hypothermia for moderate-severe HIE. Recruitment took place in the United States from 2017-2019. Analysis focused on 180 infants with biomarker measurements performed at baseline, day 2, and day 4 of life. Outcomes assessed were: a diagnosis of CP at 2 years; Bayley III cognitive/language scores <85 and, separately, <70 at 2 years. MRI of the brain was performed on day 4-6 of life. RESULTS: Mean gestational age was 39.0 weeks and 68 (44%) were female. After adjusting for multiple comparisons, 5 biomarkers: Tau, GFAP, VEGF, MIP-1b, and IL-13 were significantly altered in the CP group. On day 2 of life, Tau resulted in a receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (AUC) of 0.902 (95% CI 0.812-0.992), specificity 91%, sensitivity 88%, performing as well as detailed MRI scoring (AUC 0.90 [95% CI 0.80-1.0]). A different set of biomarkers showed altered expression in those with cognitive/language delay; Tau, UCH-L1, S100B, and NSE, with the best prediction seen with Tau on day 2 of life (AUC 0.669 [95% CI 0.564-0.774], sensitivity 40%, specificity 92%). CONCLUSIONS: Tau on day 2 of life demonstrated excellent prognostic value for CP in this cohort with moderate-severe HIE and gave similar prediction to detailed MRI score on day of life 4-6. Patterns of neurospecific biomarker perturbations were different for the prediction of cognitive/language delay, but Tau on day 2 remained the best performing biomarker.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
MRCPI et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: