Key result
Fetal CVPS ≤7 linked to ~174% higher mortality versus ≥8 in high-risk pregnancies.
Why the study?
It was hypothesized that pregnancies with high-risk fetal heart disease would benefit from frequent prenatal surveillance, abnormal results would associate with worse outcomes, and cardiovascular profile scoring could identify those at highest risk of death.
Does frequent fetal surveillance improve survival in pregnancies with high-risk fetal heart disease?
Cohort (n=61)
No
Does frequent fetal surveillance improve survival in pregnancies with high-risk fetal heart disease?
Absolute Event Rate: 52% vs 19%
p-value: p=0.01
In high-risk fetal heart disease, a cardiovascular profile score ≤7 is associated with higher mortality, and abnormal surveillance often leads to emergency cesarean delivery.
Objectives We hypothesized that pregnancies with high-risk fetal heart disease (FHD) would benefit from frequent prenatal surveillance, abnormal fetal surveillance results would be associated with worse outcomes, and cardiovascular profile scoring (CVPS) could identify FHD cases at the highest risk of death. Methods A retrospective single-centre study of all actively treated pregnancies with high-risk FHD from 2006–2020. Frequency and results of fetal surveillance, survival, and mode of delivery were collected. Frequent fetal surveillance was defined as ≥ once weekly fetal well-being testing commencing by 28 0 –32 0 weeks of gestation, or from later diagnosis, until delivery. Where possible, the CVPS was calculated. Results Fetal surveillance results were available in 92% (56/61) of pregnancies with high-risk FHD and were abnormal in 18% (10/56). A final CVPS of ≤7 carried a higher mortality (11/21, 52%) than ≥8 (6/31, 19% ( P = 0.01)). There was a trend towards worse survival at the last follow-up when fetal surveillance was abnormal versus normal (40%, 4/10 vs. 72%, 33/46, P = 0.07). Survival did not differ between frequent versus infrequent surveillance (13%, 4/30 vs. 3%, 1/31, P = 0.20); nor when comparing abnormal versus normal surveillance results (20%, 2/10 vs. 7%, 3/46, P = 0.21). Where fetal surveillance was abnormal, emergency cesarean delivery was more common (70%, 7/10 vs. 4%, 2/46, P < 0.001). Conclusions Abnormal fetal surveillance results and/or a CVPS ≤7 may identify compromised fetuses with high-risk FHD who could benefit from altered management or expedited delivery. Given the high rates of abnormal fetal surveillance in high-risk FHD, frequent fetal surveillance in the third trimester should be considered.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Samuel et al. (2024) conducted a cohort in High-risk fetal heart disease (n=61). Cardiovascular profile score (CVPS) ≤7 vs. CVPS ≥8 was evaluated on Mortality (p=0.01). A cardiovascular profile score ≤7 was associated with significantly higher mortality compared to a score ≥8 (52% vs 19%, P=0.01) in pregnancies with high-risk fetal heart disease.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: