Key result
Structured communication tools during ED-to-inpatient transitions may reduce preventable harm and diagnostic momentum.
Why the study?
Emergency department to inpatient transitions represent a high-risk clinical boundary where incomplete handovers risk diagnostic momentum, missed results, delayed escalation, and compromised patient safety.
Treating the ED-to-inpatient transition as an active patient-safety intervention with structured communication of uncertainty, trajectory, and responsibility may reduce preventable harm.
May support structured ED handovers to reduce harm; hypothesis-generating and requires RCTs before practice change.
The transition of care from the emergency department (ED) to inpatient services is a high-risk clinical boundary in acute medical admissions. During this process, the patient, clinical information, diagnostic reasoning, therapeutic responsibility, pending investigations, and escalation plans must move together. When this transfer is incomplete, patients may be vulnerable to missed results, medication discrepancies, unclear ownership, delayed escalation, and diagnostic momentum, where a provisional ED label becomes accepted by subsequent teams without adequate reassessment. This narrative review examines handover failures, diagnostic momentum, and patient-safety risks during ED-to-inpatient care transitions. It also discusses how these transitions differ across health-system structures, including hospitalist-based models, acute medical take pathways, consultant-unit systems, ward transfers, high-dependency units (HDU), and intensive care settings. Common vulnerabilities include incomplete communication of illness severity, working diagnosis, diagnostic uncertainty, treatment response, pending tests, medication risks, and contingency plans. Structured communication tools such as SBAR (Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation) and I-PASS (Illness Severity, Patient Summary, Action List, Situation Awareness and Contingency Planning, Synthesis by Receiver) may improve reliability when adapted to local workflows, supported by training, and paired with receiver confirmation. The review proposes practical handover elements for acute medical admissions, emphasizing illness severity, key differentials, pending tasks, medication reconciliation, escalation triggers, and explicit accountability for follow-up. The ED-to-inpatient transition should be treated as an active patient-safety intervention rather than a purely administrative movement of the patient. Clear communication of uncertainty, trajectory, and responsibility may reduce preventable harm during acute medical admissions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abhishek Hanumanpratap Singh Kshatri (2026) conducted a review in Acute medical admissions and ED-to-inpatient care transitions. Structured communication tools (e.g., SBAR, I-PASS) and standardized handover processes was evaluated. Structured communication tools and explicit accountability during emergency department to inpatient care transitions may reduce preventable harm and diagnostic momentum.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: