Key result
Moderate-intensity rosuvastatin and ezetimibe combination therapy reduced LDL-C levels significantly more than high-intensity rosuvastatin monotherapy (-22.9% vs -15.6%, MD -7.4%, p=0.041) at 12 weeks in patients with ASCVD.
Why the study?
The study was conducted to compare the lipid-lowering efficacy and safety of moderate-intensity rosuvastatin combined with ezetimibe versus high-intensity rosuvastatin monotherapy in patients with ASCVD.
Does moderate-intensity rosuvastatin and ezetimibe combination therapy improve LDL-C reduction in patients with ASCVD compared to high-intensity rosuvastatin monotherapy?
RCT (n=270)
Open-label
Block randomization stratified by center and diabetes
Yes
Does moderate-intensity rosuvastatin and ezetimibe combination therapy improve LDL-C reduction in patients with ASCVD compared to high-intensity rosuvastatin monotherapy?
Combination therapy with moderate-intensity rosuvastatin and ezetimibe provides superior LDL-C reduction compared to high-intensity rosuvastatin monotherapy in patients with ASCVD, without increasing adverse effects.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Ezetimibe plus moderate rosuvastatin yields superior LDL-C reduction versus high-intensity rosuvastatin monotherapy in ASCVD without excess adverse events; extends support for combination as preferred initial strategy.
Objective: This phase IV, multicenter, randomized controlled, open-label, and parallel clinical trial aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of ezetimibe and moderate intensity rosuvastatin combination therapy to that of high intensity rosuvastatin monotherapy in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD).Methods: This study enrolled patients with ASCVD and after a four-week screening period, patients were randomly assigned to receive either rosuvastatin and ezetimibe (RE 10/10 group) or high-intensity rosuvastatin (R20 group) only in a 1:1 ratio.The primary outcome was the difference in the percent change in the mean low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) level from baseline to 12 weeks between two groups after treatment. Results:The study found that after 12 and 24 weeks of treatment, the RE10/10 group had a greater reduction in LDL-C level compared to the R20 group (-22.92.6% vs. -15.6 2.5% [p=0.041] and -24.22.5% vs. -12.92.4% [p=0.001] at 12 and 24 weeks, respectively).Moreover, a greater number of patients achieved the target LDL-C level of 70 mg/dL after the treatment period in the combination group (74.6% vs. 59.9% [p=0.012] and 76.2% vs. 50.8%[p<0.001] at 12 and 24 weeks, respectively).Importantly, there were no significant differences in the occurrence of overall adverse events and adverse drug reactions between two groups.Conclusion: Moderate-intensity rosuvastatin and ezetimibe combination therapy had better efficacy in lowering LDL-C levels without increasing adverse effects in patients with ASCVD than high-intensity rosuvastatin monotherapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Choi et al. (2023) conducted an RCT in Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) (n=270). Rosuvastatin and ezetimibe vs. High-intensity rosuvastatin 20 mg once daily was evaluated on Percent change in mean LDL-C level from baseline to 12 weeks (MD -7.4%, 95% CI -14.4 to -0.3, p=0.041). Moderate-intensity rosuvastatin and ezetimibe combination therapy reduced LDL-C levels significantly more than high-intensity rosuvastatin monotherapy (-22.9% vs -15.6%, MD -7.4%, p=0.041) at 12 weeks in patients with ASCVD.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: