PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 22, 2022Publications125 citationsOpen Access

Research Questions with PICO: A Universal Mnemonic

APAndreas Pacher

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

A well-formulated research question should incorporate the components of a ‘problem’, an ‘intervention’, a ‘control’, and an ‘outcome’—at least according to the PICO mnemonic. The utility of this format, however, has been said to be limited to clinical studies that pose ‘which’ questions demanding correlational study designs. In contrast, its suitability for descriptive approaches outside of clinical investigations has been doubted. This paper disagrees with the alleged limitations of PICO. Instead, it argues that the scheme can be used universally for every scientific endeavour in any discipline with all study designs. This argument draws from four abstract components common to every research, namely, a research object, a theory/method, a (null) hypothesis, and the goal of knowledge generation. Various examples of how highly heterogenous studies from different disciplines can be grounded in the single scheme of PICO are offered. The finding implies that PICO is indeed a universal technique that can be used for teaching academic writing in any discipline, beyond clinical settings, regardless of a preferred study design.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Andreas Pacher (2022) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a5f779341a687342459911fhttps://doi.org/10.3390/publications10030021
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger2016 · 14,536 citations
  2. 2Software survey: ScientoPy, a scientometric tool for topics trend analysis in scientific publications2019 · 201 citations
  3. 3Can Research Methods Ever Be Interesting?2003 · 93 citations
  4. 4Clinical Characteristics of Coronavirus Disease 2019 in China2020 · 31,247 citations
  5. 5Open Editors: A Dataset of Scholarly Journals’ Editorial Board Positions2021 · 15 citations