Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
This study investigates the mechanical performance of 3D-printed (3DP) and interpenetrating phase composite (IPC) samples, analyzing the effects of ten infill patterns and densities (25%, 50%, 75%, 100%) on tensile strength, tensile energy, and failure mechanisms. Failure patterns varied for 3DPs, Concentrics exhibited delamination, Grid45°/-45° showed diagonal cracks, and other patterns had uniform fracture pattern. IPCs were more brittle, but enhanced strength. IPC samples outperformed 3DP in tensile strength (25 MPa vs. 13 MPa) and elastic energy absorption (15.18 vs. 9.92 kJ/m², +53%), attributed to their composite structure. 3DPs showed superior plastic ( G II ) and post-ultimate ( G III ) energy absorption due to greater deformation capacity. Tensile strength increased from 13 MPa (25% infill) to 27 MPa (100% infill), and total energy ( G A ) rose 297% (17.51 to 52.06 kJ/m²). Concentric patterns achieved the highest strength (26 MPa) and energy (60 kJ/m²), while Cross patterns lagged (10 MPa, 10 kJ/m²). ZigZag and Line45°/-45° patterns balanced strength and ductility (60 kJ/m²). Normalized strength at 75% infill for IPC (0.11–1.16) surpassed 3DP (-12% to -44%), highlighting IPC’s strength retention. These results suggest IPC’s suitability for structural applications and 3DP’s advantage in energy dissipation. Concentric or ZigZag patterns are recommended for optimal performance.
Ali et al. (Sun,) studied this question.