Demonstrates reduced costs and risks in rural logistics using an innovative model.
Rural logistics continues to struggle with persistent challenges, including high infrastructure costs, frequent road accidents, toll fees, and inefficient routing practices. Classical single-period inventory routing models fail to adapt routing attributes (transportation costs, risks, route-access tolls, and distances) and inventory management over time. Integrating pickup and delivery, in which transport vehicles pick up goods on return trips after deliveries, remains critical to reducing miles. This study presents a novel mathematical model for the multi-period inventory pickup and delivery problem in rural logistics, considering multi-attribute alternative routes. The model includes routes between locations, each characterized by cost, risk, and toll attributes. It is applied to a mixed urban–rural system where an urban distribution center serves dispersed customers. The model minimizes cost and accident risk using data. A North Florida case study demonstrates effectiveness, with a tailored non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm II (NSGA-II) achieving 7%–14% reductions in cost and risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Saeidi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: