Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Prospective validation study finds BRACHA-S effectively predicts intervention needs in pediatric psychiatric patients.
OBJECTIVES To validate the 5-item Brief Rating of Aggression in Children and Adolescents–Short (BRACHA-S) completed by emergency department (ED) nurses at triage for predicting agitation requiring intervention (ARI) among pediatric ED psychiatric or mental and behavioral health (MBH) encounters. METHODS We conducted a prospective observational prognostic validation study (October 2024-November 2025) at 2 pediatric EDs. Eligible encounters included children aged 5 to 18 years presenting with MBH concerns. After ED arrival, nurses completed the 5 BRACHA-S items assessing aggression-related history and current agitation (total score, 0–5). ARI was defined as pharmacologic treatment of agitation/aggression and/or physical or mechanical restraint use. Discrimination was assessed with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). Performance characteristics were estimated for a 3-tier model (scores 0–2, 3, and 4–5). RESULTS Among 472 encounters, 55 (11.7%) had ARI. BRACHA-S scores were associated with ARI (AUROC, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.64–0.79). ARI incidence increased with score: 0, 3.3% (2/60); 1, 6.3% (6/96); 2, 6.4% (7/110); 3, 12.4% (17/137); 4, 31.8% (14/44); and 5, 36.0% (9/25). Scores 0 to 1 had a negative predictive value of 96.7% but a specificity of 13.9%. Scores 4 to 5 had a specificity of at least 89% and a positive predictive value of greater than 33%. Compared with scores 0 to 2, relative risk of ARI was 2.2 (95% CI, 1.1–4.3) for score 3 and 5.9 (95% CI, 3.3–10.7) for scores 4 to 5. CONCLUSIONS In pediatric ED MBH encounters, the nurse-completed triage BRACHA-S demonstrated moderate discrimination and identified clinically meaningful risk gradients for ARI that may support early safety planning.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Babcock et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: