Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Examines THM processes impacting freeze-thaw damage in SFRC, suggesting improved infrastructure durability.
Understanding the coupled thermo–hydro–mechanical (THM) processes governing freeze–thaw (F–T) damage in steel fibre-reinforced concrete (SFRC) is essential for improving the durability of cold-region infrastructure. Fully three-dimensional mesoscopic THM simulations are often computationally prohibitive, limiting systematic mechanism identification and parameter sensitivity analyses. This study develops a computationally efficient two-dimensional (2D) mesoscopic coupled THM framework that explicitly represents mortar, aggregates, steel fibres, and interfacial transition zones (ITZs), and accounts for heat transfer, moisture transport, ice-water phase transition, and stress development. Comparisons with the present F–T experiments show that the model captures the measured temperature histories at the specimen centre (MAE = 2.48 °C; RMSE = 3.19 °C) and predicts the evolution of pore pressure and associated stress development. Parametric analyses indicate that mortar permeability governs pore-pressure diffusion and stress relaxation: higher permeability promotes pressure dissipation and reduces tensile-stress build-up, whereas lower permeability favours pressure accumulation and localised cracking. The water–cement ratio ( w / c ) regulates pressure build-up by altering porosity and the amount of freezable water. Fibre geometry primarily affects local crack deflection and bridging, while its influence on the global pore-pressure response remains limited in the present simulations. The proposed framework enables THM-based mechanistic interpretation of F–T deterioration and provides an efficient tool for trend-level durability assessment and mixture-design optimisation of SFRC in cold regions, while quantitative prediction of absolute peak pore pressures and localised stresses still requires full three-dimensional simulations or direct experimental validation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jiang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: