Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Investigates hydrogen dissociation kinetics in nanocatalysts, suggesting design improvements for catalysis.
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide Hydrogen dissociation is an essential step in hydrogenation catalysis and critical to catalyst performance. Recently, Au–Pd core-shell nanoparticle catalysts have emerged as a highly promising class of materials for hydrogenation catalysis. Yet, fundamental understanding on the origin of bimetallic synergy in these core-shell catalysts and their interaction with hydrogen is largely unknown. Here, we investigate the kinetics of hydrogen dissociation and recombination over Au–Pd core-shell catalysts using the hydrogen-deuterium (HD) exchange reaction. We employed colloidally prepared core-shell nanorod catalysts and used 4D scanning transmission electron microscopy to assess the degree and directionality of the strain in the Pd-shell. This revealed that even relatively thick Pd-shells are highly strained in the direction parallel to the surface. Catalytic testing showed that the HD exchange rate increases with increasing Pd-shell thickness and drastically decreases upon alloying. Interestingly, the core-shell nanorods showed temperature-dependent apparent activation energies and pre-exponential factors, indicating the presence of hydrides in the Pd-shell at the lower temperatures and gradual hydrogen release upon heating. Density functional theory calculations indicate that subsurface hydrogen plays a major role in accelerating the hydrogen-deuterium exchange reaction by providing a lower energy pathway for recombinative desorption of hydrogen and deuterium, which is the rate limiting step. Altogether, our combined experiment-theory approach revealed that lattice strain and hydride formation can significantly influence the hydrogenation behavior of Au–Pd core-shell nanoparticles and is relevant to further advance the design of core-shell materials for hydrogenation catalysis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lankman et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: