Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates analyte-dependent electrostatic-transport coupling in graphene FET biosensors, suggesting tunable sensing capabilities.
The transfer curve of a graphene field-effect transistor (GFET) biosensor encodes analyte information through multiple figures of merit, yet how electrostatic gating and carrier transport couple at the graphene–electrolyte interface remains unresolved. Here, stability-filtered polynomial analysis of three reduced graphene oxide GFET datasets (pH, Cl−, and HEV ORF2) is consistent with analyte-dependent coupling patterns across these three representative systems: ionic sensing—particularly pH—exhibits a stable, reproducible VCNP·gm,h interaction consistent with co-varying surface-potential shifts and mobility changes, whereas protein detection (ORF2) is characterized by transconductance–curvature cross terms consistent with Debye-screened scattering. Chloride sensing occupies an intermediate regime with weaker but reproducible VCNP-linked contributions within a curvature-dominant pattern. These explicit second-order coupling terms suggest that ionic-sensing behavior may be associated with electrostatic–transport coupling, which is potentially tunable through quantum-capacitance/double-layer engineering, while protein sensing appears to respond primarily through scattering channels accessible via functionalization design.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: