Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Study optimizes emergency medical services in urban-rural regions, indicating improved response and coverage.
Economic analysis of public sectors shows that regional heterogeneity, particularly in population density, significantly influences the provision of cost‐effective services. To balance service supply costs and spatial accessibility, different service standards are typically recommended for urban and rural areas. This paper proposes a novel location and size optimization model for planning emergency medical service (EMS) stations in urban and rural areas. The model incorporates distinct EMS planning parameters for both urban and rural regions. Using multi‐source big data, including population mobility and time‐dependent traffic, and dividing a day into multiple time periods, the model was validated through a case study in Zhengzhou, a megacity in China. The case study demonstrated that the proposed approach significantly enhanced the EMS system by optimizing the number of EMS stations, ambulances, and crews, while reducing the average emergency response times and improving service coverage, especially in rural areas. Furthermore, the proposed model outperformed existing planning approaches in urban–rural regions. The simulation results of EMS operations indicate that, compared to the existing EMS system, the optimized locations and sizes of EMS stations reduce facility and personnel costs while delivering faster response times and higher service coverage. Importantly, the model, algorithm, case study, and EMS operations simulation presented in this paper provide an effective solution for planning emergency stations in urban–rural regions, demonstrating strong practical value.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: