Demonstrates food choice shifts due to Nutri-Score labels in consumers, highlighting implications for health messaging.
= 792), participants made purchase choices across 30 pairs of familiar grocery products. Nutri-Score presence (present vs. absent) and a brief health-goal prompt ("Which product is healthier?"; present vs. absent) were manipulated between participants. We also categorized product pairs based on whether Nutri-Score ratings aligned with participants' prelabel healthiness judgments. Overall, displaying Nutri-Score increased the selection of the higher Nutri-Score option. This shift was largest when the label confirmed prior beliefs and the health-goal prime was present. When Nutri-Score contradicted prior beliefs, the label shifted choices even without the prime. These findings suggest that Nutri-Score effectiveness depends on goal salience and on whether the label provides expectation-consistent versus expectation-inconsistent information; in some cases, unexpectedly favorable ratings on tempting products may also be experienced as more permissible, a possibility that policymakers should consider. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hasni et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: