Investigates DcR3's role in suppressing aggresome-like structures in macrophages, suggesting a novel function in protein homeostasis.
Decoy receptor 3 (DcR3) is a pleiotropic soluble factor that modulates cellular functions through both decoy and non-decoy mechanisms. DcR3 has been reported to exert anti-apoptotic and anti-inflammatory effects in humans, particularly in cancers and inflammatory diseases. In the present study, we investigated the role of DcR3 in TLR4-mediated innate immune responses in macrophages. Because the DcR3 gene is absent in the mouse genome, we generated myeloid-specific DcR3 knock-in mice and isolated bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs) for functional analyses. Our results showed that DcR3 did not significantly affect LPS-induced expression of COX-2, iNOS, NLRP3, or pro-IL-1β. Aggresome-like induced structures (ALIS), which consist of aggregates of ubiquitinated proteins, are stress-induced cytoplasmic compartments implicated in MHC class I antigen presentation. We found that DcR3 suppressed LPS-induced ALIS formation by attenuating cellular reactive oxygen species production and p38 MAPK activation. In addition to LPS stimulation, DcR3 also reduced the accumulation of ubiquitinated proteins induced by HO-1 inhibitor ZnPP, lysosomal inhibitor bafilomycin A1, and proteasomal inhibitor MG132. Consistent with a role for autophagy in ALIS regulation, rapamycin reduced LPS-induced ALIS formation, whereas bafilomycin A1 induced comparable LC3-II accumulation in both wild-type and DcR3-expressing macrophages. Furthermore, DcR3 expression did not significantly alter LPS-induced p62 or HO-1 expression. Collectively, although DcR3 does not markedly influence LPS-induced inflammatory responses in BMDMs, our findings reveal a previously unrecognized role for DcR3 in suppressing ALIS formation and the accumulation of ubiquitinated proteins in macrophages, thereby suggesting a novel function for DcR3 in maintaining intracellular protein homeostasis under stress conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: