Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Proposes a Hybrid Ecological Typology framework for ecological connectivity assessment, highlighting spatial challenges.
Anthropogenic pressures increasingly threaten ecological connectivity and basin-scale ecological sustainability in peri-urban landscapes. This study proposes a Hybrid Ecological Typology framework for the Büyükçekmece Lake Basin (Istanbul, Türkiye), integrating Morphological Spatial Pattern Analysis (MSPA), Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), and Minimum Cumulative Resistance (MCR) analysis within a unified spatial decision-support system. The framework is applied to a 67,627.06 ha basin area, including a 25,976.99 ha terrestrial focus area. The results indicate a structurally heterogeneous landscape dominated by interior habitat zones (85.94%) distributed across 93 core patches. Despite this dominance, ecological connectivity is maintained through a highly fragmented network of 484 landscape elements, where limited bridge (0.08%) and branch (0.62%) structures highlight structural vulnerability. Edge-dominated zones (12.87%) further reflect strong anthropogenic fragmentation pressures. Connectivity analysis identifies 10 key habitat patches with dPC (Probability of Connectivity index) values exceeding 5% and 12 strategic ecological corridors supporting basin-scale ecological flows. The proposed hybrid typology delineates five functional planning categories: conservation areas (22.72%), ecological corridors (1.91%), restoration areas (1.63%), sustainable use areas (0.51%), and controlled development areas (8.11%). Although high-quality habitat cores dominate the basin, ecological connectivity remains spatially constrained, with bottleneck zones (0.89%) concentrated along transportation corridors that significantly reduce landscape permeability. Overall, the findings demonstrate that basin-scale ecological sustainability in peri-urban environments is governed not only by habitat quantity but also by the interaction between spatial configuration and resistance structures. The framework provides a transferable decision-support tool that bridges landscape ecology theory with spatial planning practice for basin management and ecological network design.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ayaşlıgil et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: