Key result
Robotic-assisted and laparoscopic RYGB similarly improve pulmonary function and physical activity at six months.
Why the study?
Evidence comparing the effects of laparoscopic and robotic-assisted Roux-en-Y gastric bypass on respiratory outcomes remains limited.
Does laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass compared to robotic-assisted bypass improve lung function, respiratory muscle strength, and physical activity in patients with severe obesity?
Cohort (n=98)
No
Does laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass compared to robotic-assisted bypass improve lung function, respiratory muscle strength, and physical activity in patients with severe obesity?
Both laparoscopic and robotic-assisted Roux-en-Y gastric bypass improve pulmonary function at six months, with no significant differences between the two surgical approaches.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Both approaches yield similar pulmonary recovery at six months; leaves open whether robotic assistance confers advantages in randomized trials.
Obesity is a chronic and multifactorial disease associated with systemic changes and pulmonary impairment. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is effective in treating severe obesity and has been associated with improvements in pulmonary function; however, evidence comparing the effects of laparoscopic (L) and robotic-assisted (RA) RYGB on respiratory outcomes remains limited. To compare the effects of L- and RA- RYGB on lung function, respiratory muscle strength and physical activity level, at baseline and six months postoperatively. Prospective, non-randomized study conducted at a private bariatric surgery center in Brazil, including patients of both sexes, aged 18-65 years with body mass index (BMI) 40.0-49.9 kg/m² undergoing Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Patients with a history of smoking or pre-existing pulmonary disease were excluded. Patients were divided into L- and RA- groups and evaluated at baseline and six months after surgery with spirometry (forced vital capacity [FVC], forced expiratory volume in one second [FEV₁], and FEV₁/FVC ratio), manovacuometry (maximal inspiratory pressure [MIP] and maximal expiratory pressure [MEP]), and physical activity level (International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short Form [IPAQ-SF]), following ATS/ERS standards. Statistical analyses included chi-square, Fisher's exact, Student's t, Mann-Whitney U, and mixed-effects models (p < 0.05). A total of 98 patients were included (49 L-, 49 RA-), with 84 completing the six-month follow-up. Among those who completed follow-up, most participants were women (75.0%), with a mean age of 37.3 years. Significant improvements in pulmonary function were observed over time following surgery. Although a reduction in maximal expiratory pressure was observed in the laparoscopic group in within-group analyses, mixed-effects models showed no significant differences between surgical approaches regarding respiratory muscle strength, pulmonary function, physical activity level, or longitudinal changes over time. Laparoscopic and robotic-assisted Roux-en-Y gastric bypass were associated with improved pulmonary function six months after surgery, with no significant differences between surgical approaches in respiratory outcomes or physical activity level.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
BARETTA et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Morbid obesity (n=98). Robotic-assisted Roux-en-Y gastric bypass vs. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass was evaluated on Longitudinal changes in pulmonary function (FVC, FEV1) and respiratory muscle strength at 6 months. Robotic-assisted and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass both improved pulmonary function at six months, with no significant differences between the surgical approaches in respiratory outcomes or physical activity.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: