Experimental trial investigates density in bi-solvent blends for CO2 capture, highlighting effective predictive modeling methods.
The density of CO₂-unloaded and CO₂-loaded aqueous solutions of 2-amino-2-methyl-1-propanol (AMP) + 1,5-diamino-2-methylpentane (DA2MP) and methyldiethanolamine (MDEA) + DA2MP bi-solvent blends were experimentally investigated under varying amine concentrations (2–5 M), temperatures (25–50 °C), and CO₂ loadings (0–1.0 mol CO₂/mol amine). To predict the experimental results, 4 modeling approaches were applied: artificial neural networks (ANN), response surface methodology (RSM), Nwaoha’s nonlinear model, and Nwaoha et al.’s modified nonlinear model. Results showed that higher CO₂ loading increased density, while higher temperature and amine blend concentration reduced density. Predictive modeling demonstrated that the ANN exhibited the highest accuracy, achieving a maximum absolute average deviation (%AAD) of 0.38%, a high coefficient of determination (R²) of 0.9999, and the highest mean squared error (MSE) of 1.6E-5. Meanwhile, the modified nonlinear model had a maximum %AAD of 0.78%, the highest R² of 0.9697, and the highest MSE value of 1.05E-4. The nonlinear model achieved maximum %AAD of 0.9155%, highest R² of 0.9309, and highest MSE value of 1.15E-4. The RSM showed maximum %AAD of 2.1401%, highest R² of 0.9782, and MSE of 4.97E-4. The predictive performance of the models follows this trend: ANN > modified nonlinear model > nonlinear model > RSM. Notably, the modified nonlinear model, despite requiring significantly less computational effort and expertise compared to ANN and RSM, proved to be highly effective for accurately predicting density.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nwaoha et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: