Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Usability evaluation shows effective self-assessment of functional autonomy in adolescents, suggesting improved engagement and goal-setting.
BACKGROUND: Adolescence is a critical developmental period characterized byincreasing independence, functional autonomy, and participation across lifedomains. Despite the importance of supporting adolescents in reflecting ontheir functioning and identifying meaningful goals, few adolescent-centeredtools enable self-assessment of functional autonomy and participation inengaging, digitally accessible formats. This study aimed to develop Take PART(Participation and Activities Rating for Teenagers), a computerized assessmentof functional autonomy and participation, and evaluate its usability. METHODS: The development of Take PARTwas conducted in two phases. Phase 1 focused on content generation and platformdevelopment using adolescent-reported activities, expert review, and auser-centered design process. Activities were organized into five life domains:self-care; daily activities at home and in the community; academicparticipation; work and volunteering; and leisure/social participation. Phase 2evaluated usability among 119 adolescents aged 12-18 years and 50 examinersusing the Post-Study System Usability Questionnaire (PSSUQ). RESULTS: Adolescent reports informed the development of a 65-itemassessment reflecting everyday participation and functional autonomy. Expertreview contributed to the refinement of the domains, items, and platformstructure. The final assessment supports individualized domain selection andcollaborative goal-setting. Usability findings indicated high levels of systemusefulness, information quality, and interface quality among both adolescentsand examiners.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lamash et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: