Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Examines socio-emotional challenges in children who stutter, suggesting intervention needs.
Stuttering is increasingly recognized as a neurodevelopmental condition extending beyond speech-motor disruptions to include socio-emotional and social-cognitive processes. This study examined emotion regulation, empathy, and theory of mind (ToM) in children who stutter (CWS) compared to typically developing peers. Eighty school-aged children (41 CWS, 39 children who do not stutter [CWNS]) were assessed using the Emotion Regulation Checklist (ERC), Bryant Index of Empathy (BIE), and Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test – Child Version (RMET-C). CWS demonstrated significantly greater emotion regulation difficulties (higher Lability/Negativity and total ERC scores; all p < 0.001), lower empathy (p < 0.001), and poorer ToM performance (p < 0.001) than CWNS. False Discovery Rate-corrected item-level analyses identified five RMET-C items on which CWS showed reduced accuracy, spanning affectively valenced states (worried, carefree, friendly) and cognitively complex mental states (thinking about something, certain). A sensitivity analysis excluding CWS with comorbid ADHD (n = 31) replicated all primary findings. Within the CWS group, female gender (p = 0.003) and higher maternal education (p = 0.001) predicted greater empathy, whereas psychiatric comorbidity predicted lower empathy (p = 0.022) and greater emotion regulation difficulties (p = 0.008). Stuttering severity was not associated with any socio-emotional outcome (all p > 0.05). These findings suggest that CWS experience significant socio-emotional and social-cognitive difficulties independent of disfluency severity. Multidimensional assessment and intervention addressing emotion regulation and social cognition alongside speech fluency may support optimal developmental outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Şahin et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: