Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Randomized trial evaluates safety and noninferiority of a novel laser in treating freckles, indicating effective outcomes.
Background The picosecond Nd:YAG laser is a standard treatment for freckles. However, factors such as cost and technology barriers may limit accessibility, necessitating evaluation of alternative systems.Objectives To evaluate the noninferiority and safety of a novel 532-nm picosecond Nd:YAG laser versus an established system for treating freckles.Methods In this randomized, evaluator-blinded, split-face trial, 84 participants received a single treatment session. Contralateral facial sides were randomly assigned to the investigational or control device in a 1:1 ratio. The primary endpoint was the response rate at week 8. Secondary endpoints included the cure rate, investigator-assessed improvement, patient satisfaction and procedural tolerability. Safety was assessed by adverse events monitoring.Results The investigational device demonstrated noninferiority to the control (response rates: 97.6% vs. 97.6%; difference, 0.0%; 95% confidence interval: −3.30% to 3.30%) with comparable cure rates (13.1% vs. 9.5%, p = .527). Participant satisfaction was significantly higher with the investigational device (72.6% vs. 58.3%, p = .001). Treatment duration suggested an association with superior efficacy (OR = 2.07, 95% CI: 1.14–3.76, p = .016). No serious adverse effects occurred.Conclusion The novel 532-nm picosecond Nd:YAG laser is noninferior to the established system, with comparable short-term efficacy and safety. Further studies are needed to assess long-term safety.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhou et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: