Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
To the outsider, this discussion concerning proper methodology for assessing the effects of smoking and nicotine upon human cognitive performance might appear to be an esoteric dispute among scientists. In fact, the implications of methodological errors which lead researchers to conclude incorrectly that smoking benefits cognitive performance in some general fashion are both far-reaching and costly. For example, the
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Andy C. Parrott (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: