Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A computational code has been developed for aeroelastic analysis. The structural bending and torsional stiffness for an all-movable horizontal tail are basedupon the experimental data published inWrightAirDevelopmentCenter technical report 54-53 (Niles, R. H., and Spielberg, I. N., “Subsonic Flutter Tests of An Unswept All-Movable Horizontal Tail,”WrightAirDevelopment Center TR-54-53,March 1954.). A linear three-dimensional time domain vortex lattice aerodynamic model is used to study the flutter and also nonlinear limit-cycle oscillations induced by a free-play gap in the actuating mechanism at the root of the tail as well as the effects of the nominal angle of attack on limit-cycle oscillation response. It is found that the angle of attack significantly affects the limit-cycle oscillation behavior and if sufficiently largemay suppress the limit-cycle oscillation. The computed flutter results are compared with the experimental data with good quantitative agreement between theory and experiment for flutter in this paper, Part 1, and for limit-cycle oscillation in Part 2 (Tang, D., andDowell, E. H., “Aeroelastic Response Induced by Free Play, Part 2: Theoretical/Experimental Correlation Analysis,” AIAA Journal, Vol. 49, No. 11, 2011, pp. 2543– 2554).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tang et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: