PURPOSE: To compare intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements by the Tono-Pen 2 tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) in post-photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) patients. SETTING: Refractive Surgery Center, Assaf Harofeh Medical Center, Zerifin, Israel. METHODS: In 18 patients, IOP was measured by GAT and then by Tono-Pen 2 tonometer 2 to 18 months following PRK (mean 6.6 months +/- 5.1 [SD]). Photorefractive keratectomy had been performed in 1 eye of each patient; the fellow eyes served as controls. Corneal curvature and thickness were evaluated. Ten of the 18 patients were treated with topical steroids. RESULTS: In the post-PRK eyes, mean GAT IOP was 1.8 +/- 3.1 mm Hg lower than mean Tono-Pen IOP (P = .012); there was no significant IOP difference in the control (fellow) eyes. In steroid-treated post-PRK eyes, mean GAT IOP (12.2 mm Hg) was 2.2 +/- 1.3 mm Hg lower than mean Tono-Pen IOP (14.4 mm Hg) (P = .0007). Mean Tono-Pen IOP in steroid-treated post-PRK eyes was 4.3 +/- 3 mm Hg higher than in the fellow eyes (P = .0014); mean GAT IOP was only 2.3 +/- 3.5 mm Hg higher (P = .04). In post-PRK eyes without topical steroid treatment, mean GAT IOP was 2.0 +/- 1.18 mm Hg lower than in the fellow eyes (P = .001); there was no significant difference in Tono-Pen IOP. There was a negative correlation between the difference in IOP values (Tono-Pen minus GAT) and corneal curvature in post-PRK eyes (r = 0.76, P = .0108, n = 15). CONCLUSIONS: The Tono-Pen tonometer appeared to be less affected than the GAT by the relative flattening, thinning, and anterior stromal decreased rigidity of the central cornea that occur following PRK. Post-PRK steroid-induced IOP elevation may be masked by the artifactual decrease in GAT IOP.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Levy et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: