Accurate state-of-health (SOH) estimation is essential for safe and reliable lithium-ion battery management, yet practical deployment requires not only point accuracy but also strong generalization, explainability, interpretability, and transparency under domain shift. To address this need, we propose a Physics-Prompt Cross-Attention Network (PPCAN) that incorporates electrochemical degradation knowledge into a data-driven predictor through a cross-attention mechanism. Unlike physics-informed neural networks (PINNs), which impose physical laws as soft penalties in the loss function, PPCAN represents key electrochemical variables—including Ohmic resistance ( R 0 ), SEI resistance ( R sei ), lithium-ion diffusion coefficient ( D s ), and cyclable lithium inventory ( C li )—as structured physical prompts that guide feature extraction and prediction. Because the current-cycle lithium-inventory proxy C li ( t ) is capacity-derived and may act as a label proxy, we distinguish this setting from leakage-safer controls rather than treating it as a strictly label-independent input. A dedicated leakage-stress matrix shows that the current-cycle setting provides a diagnostic upper-bound result (OOD RMSE 0.0056), while a one-cycle-delayed cycle-level setting using C li ( t − 1) achieves a similar OOD RMSE of 0.0065 without using the target-cycle capacity. In this setting, C li ( t − 1) is a historical state available after the previous cycle has been completed, and the model estimates cycle- t SOH from the sensor sequence observed in cycle t ; it is therefore a quasi-online SOH estimation protocol rather than a pre-cycle prediction protocol. The model also transfers across battery chemistries, retaining useful performance on mixed-chemistry batteries when initialized from single-material pretraining. Overall, the proposed framework provides a transparent and physically grounded route to battery SOH estimation under changing operating conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: