OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the diagnostic utility of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) compared to conventional culture in patients with suspected septic arthritis, stratified by synovial fluid white blood cell (SF-WBC) count. METHODS: A retrospective observational study was conducted on 82 consecutive patients with clinically suspected septic arthritis. Patients were categorized based on actual clinical testing pathways: complete triple testing (routine analysis, culture, and mNGS; n = 54), culture and mNGS only (n = 27), or mNGS only (n = 1). Detection rates, turnaround times, and clinical impact were analyzed across WBC strata. RESULTS: mNGS demonstrated a significantly higher overall detection rate than culture (65.9% vs 33.3%, P < 0.001). This diagnostic advantage was most pronounced in the diagnostically challenging subgroup of patients with SF-WBC count <25,000/µL, where mNGS had a significantly higher pathogen detection rate than culture (50.0% [19/38] vs 23.7% [9/38]; P < 0.05). Among the 27 patients positive by both methods, mNGS revealed discrepant or additional findings in 9 cases (33.3%), including viruses, fungi, and fastidious bacteria, which required clinical adjudication. The median reporting time was shorter for mNGS than culture (67 vs 86 hours, P < 0.001). Clinical management was guided solely by mNGS in 23 patients (28.0%), including 21 culture-negative cases and 2 where mNGS results preceded culture. CONCLUSION: mNGS provides significant diagnostic value in suspected septic arthritis, particularly in culture-negative cases and those with low SF-WBC counts. It should be used selectively as an adjunct to culture, which remains essential for antimicrobial susceptibility testing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: