Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Hearing aid users frequently struggle to understand speech in noisy environments, negatively impacting their quality of life. Inspired by recent progress in speech technology through community-driven machine learning challenges, the Clarity project launched the first-ever Clarity Enhancement Challenge (CEC1). This challenge specifically addressed speech-in-noise enhancement for hearing aids, uniquely combining objective and subjective intelligibility evaluations to assess performance. Participants developed algorithms aimed at improving speech intelligibility in a simulated domestic environment featuring a target speaker and a stationary noise interferer—either competing speech or domestic appliances. Competitors were provided with an open-source dataset, comprising a novel 40-speaker British English corpus, realistic domestic noise samples, and a baseline hearing aid model with basic signal processing. This paper describes the design and outcomes of CEC1. Thirteen entries were evaluated objectively using the Modified Binaural Short-Time Objective Intelligibility metric (MBSTOI) and subjectively by a listening panel of hearing-impaired individuals. The majority of systems employed deep neural networks (DNNs), classical beamforming, or a combination of both. Results showed significant intelligibility gains over the baseline, particularly for systems combining adaptive beamforming with neural network-based noise reduction. However, algorithms optimised directly for MBSTOI scores did not always translate to real-world listening benefits, highlighting the critical importance of perceptual evaluation in assessing intelligibility. These findings underscore the potential of machine-learning-driven approaches for enhancing hearing aid performance and set a foundation for future challenges addressing dynamic and more realistic auditory scenarios.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Graetzer et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: